<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Having Said That... &#187; Johnny Depp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://havingsaidthat.net/tag/johnny-depp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://havingsaidthat.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Now Playing Review &#8211; The Rum Diary</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/10/27/now-playing-review-the-rum-diary/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/10/27/now-playing-review-the-rum-diary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Eckhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amber Heard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giovanni Ribisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Rispoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rum Diary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=8598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago when Captain Jack Sparrow was wondering where all the rum had gone, he probably would have never guessed that it was being stockpiled for another movie by the man filling his shoes.  That traitor!  Johnny Depp’s appropriately titled new film, The Rum Diary, has lots of rum, and not much else. Based on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F10%2F27%2Fnow-playing-review-the-rum-diary%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F10%2F27%2Fnow-playing-review-the-rum-diary%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/10/27/now-playing-review-the-rum-diary/rum_diary/" rel="attachment wp-att-8599"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8599" title="rum_diary" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/rum_diary-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>Years ago when Captain Jack Sparrow was wondering where all the rum had gone, he probably would have never guessed that it was being stockpiled for another movie by the man filling his shoes.  That traitor!  Johnny Depp’s appropriately titled new film, <em>The Rum Diary</em>, has lots of rum, and not much else.</p>
<p>Based on the book of the same name, <em>The Rum Diary</em> finds Paul Kemp in Puerto Rico as he continues his life as a reporter.  At least that is what he tells himself, because let’s be honest, he went there to drink.  And drink he does, using alcohol as a lubricant for better enjoyment of the island culture, mixing it up with the local cock fighters, sailing around in the calm seas, falling in “love” with a beautiful woman (albeit from Connecticut), catching wind of some white man corruption.  You know, the usual.<span id="more-8598"></span></p>
<p>Depp gives the role his all, granted it isn’t far from one of his most iconic characters of the recent past.  He wobbles with the grace of a just-born giraffe, has a glazed expression in his eyes as he tries to focus on what is important, and for lack of a better phrase, he drinks far more than a sailor.  Laughs are had, especially when he has a fellow newspaper worker in Sala (played by Michael Rispoli) to sing “99 Bottles of Rum on the Wall” with as they act it out together, but I think I passed my limit for rum soaked Depp a couple films back.  Giovanni Ribisi joins the party from time to time as a fellow man searching for truths through a highly intoxicated state of mind (possibly weakened by brain damage at this point as well), and though he provides some fantastic lines whenever he’s on screen (at least when they aren’t too incoherently slurred), there quickly comes a point when watching the film just feels like what it was like to be the designated driver at a college party where everyone else is drunk.  Generally the stupidity that people quickly sink to can provide plenty of laughs in response to their antics, but there comes a point where it loses its entertainment value and just becomes sad.</p>
<p>Surprisingly there is actually a deeper story to the film as Kemp comes across a fraction of the corruption mentioned above, and though he does have some ideals to stand on, these quickly get lost as he dedicates his time to other things.  Seeing as the title is <em>The Rum Diary</em> this should probably be expected, but it just becomes impossible to believe in the character when he is living the lifestyle of an alcoholic.  Occasionally he presents an article focusing on the issues of the island, but these are pushed aside by a boss who understands that this is not what the people reading the paper want, and Kemp hardly does anything to fight the system.  If anything, he only does slightly attempt to bring the lies to light when he has no other options.  He may have morals somewhere deep down, and beliefs worthy of praise in concern to how the world should be, but his conviction and dedication to things worthy of his time are drowned by the bottles he downs, leading to a lackluster film with just as little focus as the main character (and an even weaker ending).</p>
<p><em>The Rum Diary</em> is good for a laugh or two, but in the end, save your money and go down to the local frat house to watch the natives embarrass themselves.  The experience will be the same (except for the higher percentage of getting puked on).</p>
<p><strong>Final Grade:</strong>  C-</p>
<p><a href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/10/27/now-playing-review-the-rum-diary/2011_the_rum_diary_020/" rel="attachment wp-att-8600"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8600" title="2011_the_rum_diary_020" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/2011_the_rum_diary_020.jpg" alt="" width="674" height="448" /></a></p>
<p><a class="twitter-follow-button" href="http://twitter.com/BewareOfTrees" data-button="grey" data-text-color="#FFFFFF" data-link-color="#00AEFF" data-show-count="false">Follow @BewareOfTrees</a></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/10/27/now-playing-review-the-rum-diary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Playing Review &#8211; Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/24/now-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/24/now-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 08:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astrid Berges-Frisbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey Rush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian McShane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin McNally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penélope Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirates of the Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Claflin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=6326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the release of L.A. Noire last Tuesday my time has been embarrassingly devoted to playing through the video game, so I may have gotten behind on reviewing the new Pirates of the Caribbean film.  I wish I could say this was the only reason for the delay, but it may have to do with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F05%2F24%2Fnow-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F05%2F24%2Fnow-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-6327" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/24/now-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_ver3/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6327" title="pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_ver3" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_ver3-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>With the release of L.A. Noire last Tuesday my time has been embarrassingly devoted to playing through the video game, so I may have gotten behind on reviewing the new <em>Pirates of the Caribbean </em>film.  I wish I could say this was the only reason for the delay, but it may have to do with the simple fact that I didn’t want to admit that I did not really like it (granted the power outage didn&#8217;t help).  Guess it won’t be getting that spot on my list of the successful high numbered sequels of the year after all…</p>
<p><em>On Stranger Tides</em> brings back everyone’s favorite swashbuckler in the hopes of restoring the series to the glory that has been slowly washing away since <em>The Curse of the Black Pearl</em>.  Johnny Depp is as entertainingly eccentric as ever as Captain Jack Sparrow on the new treasure hunt to find the Fountain of Youth, but it turns out that his perfected pirate cannot actually carry a film without the help of the characters that he was developed around in the prior films.<span id="more-6326"></span> That’s right, this time around there is no Orlando Bloom to brave the high seas for love and no Keira Knightley to duel against Barbossa with the expanse of her vocabulary (I can’t really remember what they did in the other two films post the first).  Whatever your feeling of their characters was before, the loss of the dynamic they created is greatly felt in this one.</p>
<p>A few new characters are introduced to fill the empty space at Jack’s side, starting with Angelica.  What first seems to be a very promising character thanks to her past with Jack quickly loses this edge as her true connection to the story is revealed.  Penélope Cruz does a fine job with the role she is given, but it is impossible to see past her motivation in the main body of the story that quickly takes front and center over the more interesting relationship with Jack and the potential of what she means to his character.  Instead we get some lame father/daughter story with Ian McShane’s Blackbeard.</p>
<p>Prior to <em>On Stranger Tides</em> the main antagonizing forces have always been other strong pirate captains, referring mostly to Barbossa and Davy Jones.  Created by Geoffrey Rush and Bill Nighy respectively, each had a strength of character and interesting qualities brought about by the actors filling the roles, but the same cannot be same here.  This time around McShane takes the helm of the villainous ship as Blackbeard, a character that is completely dwarfed by his predecessors, which becomes even more noticeable considering that Barbossa is still around to compare him to.</p>
<p>Other than a few comedic bits between Barbossa and Jack that draw heavily on an already well-developed relationship and rapport between the two, the movie is set adrift without any real pull.  Think of it as a fishing trip: Casting the line is easily one of the most exciting parts of the process, and <em>On Stranger Tides</em> does this with the reintroduction of Depp’s character.  Then the waiting begins.  The anticipation of the possibility of something exciting happening continues to grow, all the while the film draws out like the experience of watching a bobber that never dips below the surface of the water.  A series that once had a zest for adventure with its kraken, skeletal pirate crews, and whirlpool ship battles now has nothing quite as palpably exciting within its slowly progressing story, and all that remains is something that is challenging to get engrossed in and deserves to get thrown back.</p>
<p>In addition to the far less grandiose action elements, additional cons begin piling up: a romance between two random characters to recreate the attraction of Will and Elizabeth is forced, the inclusion of a few zombified crew members is confounding and completely unnecessary as they are thrown in with as little purpose as the Spaniards, and Blackbeard’s control over his ship just seems silly in a world that has always lived on the outskirts of reality.  Speaking of which, one bullet point for the pro side of the list is that mermaids finally make a long overdue appearance (because of their close connection to pirate lore).  If only there had been even more of them.  Possibly one named Ariel…</p>
<p>The hope with <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides </em>was to recreate what was done with the first film, but instead of recapturing what made it so inspired, all this film manages to do is build a longing to watch <em>The Curse of the Black Pearl</em> again to wash the dissatisfied taste of this one away.  There is no reason for this to be 3D, the action sequences lack excitement, the humor of the characters seems to have waned without the addition of a few key relationships that have already been formed and familiarized with the audience, and it turns out that Captain Jack Sparrow can’t actually carry a film on his own.  In the end, I’m sure there were plenty like me that hoped that this movie would be drenched in Disney magic, but unfortunately that ship sailed long ago.</p>
<p><strong>Final grade</strong>: C-</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-6328" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/24/now-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/2011_pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_001/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6328" title="2011_pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_001" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2011_pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_001.jpg" alt="" width="674" height="448" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/24/now-playing-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/19/review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/19/review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 06:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astrid Berges-Frisbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey Rush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian McShane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penélope Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Claflin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=6290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is a less fantastical experience then the previous films but if you are a fan of Jack Sparrow and the series I am sure you will find some fun in this picture. Will and Elizabeth are gone and we pick up where the last few moments of At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F05%2F19%2Freview-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F05%2F19%2Freview-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-6291" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/19/review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/pirates4/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6291" title="pirates4" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/pirates4-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is a less fantastical experience then the previous films but if you are a fan of Jack Sparrow and the series I am sure you will find some fun in this picture.</p>
<p>Will and Elizabeth are gone and we pick up where the last few moments of At World&#8217;s End left off, with Captain Jack Sparrow on the hunt for the Fountain of Youth.  Things were left leading us to believe that the race would be between Barbossa and Sparrow for the fountain, but a bit of convoluting has gotten The British and Spanish thrones involved, along with the legendary pirate Blackbeard.  In fact, our adventure begins in England where Jack is attempting to rescue Gibbs, who is accused of being Sparrow, while Jack also tracks down an imposter claiming to be Sparrow; whom is also recruiting a crew for a mysterious mission.  Barbossa is working for the English Throne, Sparrow&#8217;s ex is rolling with Blackbeard, and Jack finds himself, again, in a mix of allegiances we might not be able to keep track of.</p>
<p><span id="more-6290"></span>Luckily we can keep of track of things as the film is not nearly as convoluted as the last two sequels got at times.  The film is just as full of exposition and bloated plot points as its predecessors so if it hasn&#8217;t bothered you before I don&#8217;t know why it would start to now.  Where the film does pale compared to the previous entries is a lack of mystical/fantastical elements that littered the first three films.  The film has dashes of the fantastic that are kind of cool, and the central plot point does revolve around a potential eternal draught, but don&#8217;t expect any ghost pirates or sea creature people to be walking around.</p>
<p>The film does remain fairly fun though, especially if you enjoy Jack Sparrow.  Depp is great as the character as usual and I can enjoy just about anything with Sparrow.  The film is also basically the Jack Sparrow show, as he is in almost every scene, and it is only in the end that things get a bit divided to the secondary characters.  The new love birds the film introduces are an all right diversion but we aren&#8217;t nearly as invested in them as we were the Will/Elizabeth relationship.  The priest and mermaid are secondary characters and luckily Rob Marshall doesn&#8217;t try to elevate them anything much beyond that.  I will say I was disappointed that Gibbs was back and not stuck on The Black Pearl.  The bit with the fate of the Pearl is quite cool though and it makes me wish they embraced the fantastic a bit more.  Though outside Gibbs, Sparrow, and Barbossa don&#8217;t expect any familiar faces, and that isn&#8217;t really a bad thing; like I said, I didn&#8217;t need Gibbs.</p>
<p>The new faces are a mixed bag with Blackbeard not coming off nearly as menacing as they had hoped for. I don&#8217;t think this is the fault of Ian McShane; the film just doesn&#8217;t give any big scary moments to cement his villainy.  In fact we only assume Blackbeard is not to be trusted because of our assumed reputation of the character in history.  More successful is Penélope Cruz&#8217;s Angelica who isn&#8217;t quite the fireball Cruz is capable of but a lot of fun nonetheless.  She bounces off Depp with ease and the two have a believable history, she also looks fantastic.  Geoffrey Rush is fun as Barbossa again and I am happy to have him back along with Depp; they were the best parts of the previous trilogy. The aforementioned priest and mermaid characters don&#8217;t really show up till the second half of the film and their romance is easy and unbelievable.  Sam Claflin and Astrid Berges-Frisbey make the most of their respective parts but the characters remain barely memorable.  The mermaid effects were particularly cool though, the changing from human and back again are done extremely well.  The effects work is stellar and not very showy, but again I wish there was a bit more spectacle.</p>
<p>In the end, Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is a fun feature for Jack Sparrow fans, but not without its short comings.  Featuring a solid cast and the two friendly faces we wanted to see again the film is adequate summer fun and about what you would expect from a pirates movie.  While not as good as the first film, Stranger Tides is as a whole probably as good as the third film, but lacks any of the spectacle the grandest moments of At World&#8217;s End has.  If a fan of the series I am sure you will enjoy, but don&#8217;t expect the film to win over anyone new.</p>
<p><strong>Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is a C+</strong></p>
<p><strong>P.S. The 3D has a couple cool shots but don&#8217;t fret not being able to see in 3D; save cash if you need to</strong></p>
<p><strong><a rel="attachment wp-att-6302" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/19/review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/pirates4-2/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6302" title="Pirates4" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Pirates4-674x448.jpg" alt="" width="674" height="448" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/05/19/review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Playing Review &#8211; Rango</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/07/now-playing-review-rango/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/07/now-playing-review-rango/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abigail Breslin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfred Molina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Nighy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore Verbinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isla Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ned Beatty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Winstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Root]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Olyphant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=5959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though Rango has some of the best animation I’ve seen in a while, the quirky characters are not enough to keep the familiar story from being subpar to better films of the genre. The film opens on a chameleon named Lars during his daily routine of putting on productions with his fellow tankmates (AKA non-living [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F03%2F07%2Fnow-playing-review-rango%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F03%2F07%2Fnow-playing-review-rango%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5960" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/07/now-playing-review-rango/rango-2/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5960" title="rango" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rango1-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>Though <em>Rango</em> has some of the best animation I’ve seen in a while, the quirky characters are not enough to keep the familiar story from being subpar to better films of the genre.</p>
<p>The film opens on a chameleon named Lars during his daily routine of putting on productions with his fellow tankmates (AKA non-living items), a hobby that helps escape the static existence he has grown accustomed to.  But when he literally hits a bump in the road he goes flying out of his owner’s car to be left alone in the middle of a desert.  Venturing out away from the one marking of human civilization in this barren land, Lars eventually happens upon a small town called Dirt, where he is able to once again blend into his surroundings in the only way he knows how by stepping into the rough boots of Rango, a tough gunslinger who just might be what this town needs to survive in the worsening water shortage.<span id="more-5959"></span></p>
<p>Turning away from the style of animation that can sometimes seem overly rounded and smoothed out, the artists over at Industrial Light and Magic really create something truly spectacular with <em>Rango</em>, which I can honestly say is one of the best and most impressive animated movies I have seen in terms of aesthetics.  Other than the confusion brought on by what appeared to be a bird with a beard and the lack of truthfulness to size, almost every shot in this film is beautifully set up and animated, and I can say that this is what saved this film for me.</p>
<p>I am in no way trying to give the impression that <em>Rango</em> is a bad film in all other aspects, but I will say that for anyone familiar with westerns and films in general there isn’t a whole lot of new elements going on here.  Maybe it’s just the impressions left by <em>True Grit </em>and Red Dead Redemption, but other than a few characters that don’t fit the prototype everything is all too cookie cutter stereotypical, from the townspeople, villains, “surprises,” and questionable comments in concern to being PC.  For one thing, Wounded Bird, the “Native American” in this film, may be an animal, but I still can’t help feeling like I just witnessed something kind of racist.</p>
<p>On the whole the story of this film is lackluster, but one thing it manages to do is create some truly spectacular moments and scenes within the story that made me forget my disappointment for spans of time, especially in concern to action.  One of the best examples to give you an idea of this is a scene involving creepy, most-likely incestuous moles flying combat bats to the tune of Wagner’s “Ride of the Valkyries.”  Though my favorite music cue remains the use of “Ave Maria” towards the beginning of the film, the overall music selection in <em>Rango </em>is also one of the highlights, and one of the many ways that the film chooses to reference others.  Though I rolled my eyes at the self-referential nature of a latter scene to Gore Verbinski / Johnny Depp’s other work in <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End</em>, most are pretty great, from my geek-out inducing <em>Transformers</em> moment (in the form of an aerial roll over the characters and camera, not actual transforming) to the already mentioned <em>Apocalypse Now</em>.</p>
<p>With Johnny Depp at the center of this film it isn’t hard to fathom that the world created in <em>Rango</em> is going to be a strange little corner of the desert, which is yet another reason as to why I can’t completely write it off.  But in the end something about it just doesn’t sit right with me.  For one thing, there are bits and pieces that don’t even feel appropriate for children, who may be the only audience who won’t realize that they have seen this story before.  Then again, maybe the animation of ILM will be enough to allow most to forgive the film for its weaker points.</p>
<p><strong>Final Grade:</strong> B-</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5961" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/07/now-playing-review-rango/po100-127447-163-tif/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5961" title="po100.127447.163.tif" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011_rango_012.jpg" alt="" width="674" height="281" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/07/now-playing-review-rango/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Rango</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/06/review-rango/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/06/review-rango/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abigail Breslin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfred Molina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Nighy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore Verbinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isla Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ned Beatty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Winstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Root]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Olyphant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=5954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rango’s story might be a familiar hodgepodge of classic film’s and such, but the title character and the amount of weirdness the film throws at us elevates it to accompany the incredible ILM animation. To call the film is actually almost an understatement. The film constantly borderlines on being inappropriate for children, has some rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F03%2F06%2Freview-rango%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2011%2F03%2F06%2Freview-rango%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5956" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/06/review-rango/rango/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5956" title="rango" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rango-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>Rango’s story might be a familiar hodgepodge of classic film’s and such, but the title character and the amount of weirdness the film throws at us elevates it to accompany the incredible ILM animation.</p>
<p>To call the film is actually almost an understatement. The film constantly borderlines on being inappropriate for children, has some rather graphic imagery, and it is nearly photo realistically produced by the pros at Industrial Light and Magic.  Please, ILM, make more animated films; beautiful stuff.  I didn’t even get to see the film in its full digital glory, stuck watching on film, and it was still incredible to look at. But enough gushing on how pretty and weird it is.</p>
<p>The film follows Rango, a lizard, who has been living his life acting out scenes with his inanimate surroundings of his tank/cage.  When he is bummed out the back of his owners car with nothing but his wind up orange fish in the middle of the desert he is sent along to discover Dirt.  Dirt is a more or less waterless, western, town that is losing its town’s people by the day as their water supply has all but dried out.  When Rango shows up he puts his acting talents to work and conjures up a tough guy persona for the townsfolk and soon finds himself as the leader on the hunt for the town’s water.</p>
<p><span id="more-5954"></span>Gore Verbinski enlists Johnny Depp and a few others of his Pirates cohorts to populate the town of Dirt and the results are really quite bizarre.  From a snake that can shoot bullets from its rattler, moles that can fly bats in combat, characters casually acknowledging giant underground monsters, or armadillos that can overcome a tire through their abdomen; you will find a lot of crazy ideas here.  And it is all for the better if you ask me.  How many films out there throw references from Apocalypse Now, Chinatown, Leone “Spaghetti Westerns”, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, and Raising Arizona; just to name a few.  Speaking of Raising Arizona, the film feels like it could have been made by the Coen Brothers and I imagine if they every made an animated western revolving around a lizard it would look a lot like this.</p>
<p>The action in the film is quite impressive as well with the aforementioned bat riding scene being an incredible set piece that is worth the price of admission alone.  Humor, action, and suspense all perfectly rolled up together to create a memorable and lengthy action piece in the middle of the film.</p>
<p>There is only one misstep in my book, and it is a giant one in that it killed the tone and pacing of the film.  The film’s third act opens up with an odd and overly long encounter with the Spirit of the West that is clearly supposed to be The Man with No Name from the Leone films.  They recruit Timothy Olyphant, who is great, to voice the rugged legend but the scene meanders and serves little to no purpose.  To make it even further irrelevant, they had even already establish another sage like character, that is around directly before and after this odd dream!, that could have easily given Rango the same advice with the same impact.  The scene really took me out of the film and I don’t know if I ever fully got back.  I am sure it will play better on subsequent viewings, the Blu-ray is going to be glorious, knowing that it is coming, but it is very disappointing and odd to see Verbinski put two long and pointless dream sequences in his last two films; learn from your mistakes.</p>
<p>If there is any other complaint to make it is that the film is somehow underwhelming and unoriginal plot wise.  A Bug’s Life comes to mind on more than one occasion during the film and that isn’t the only time it seems to lift maybe more than homage. There are few surprises to be had here which is hard to believe given all the visual and character creativity on display in the film.  But like I mentioned in the opener, the creativity and weirdness Verbinski throws at us makes up for this shortcoming.</p>
<p>Johnny Depp is a joy in the film as he creates a unique and fully formed character and Rango that feels lived in.  You have surely seen in some of the commercials for the film that he acted out the film on a simple set to give the character a full body reference and it clearly paid off in the creation of the character.  Rango is in nearly every frame of the film, and Depp is the clear star here, but there are a number of other voice talents that help elevate the film.  Bill Nighy is great as Rattlesnake Jake and I really do wish we got more of him, just nasty.  Ray Winstone, Ned Beatty, and Alfred Molina are also quite fine in their work as well with Isla Fisher and Abigail Breslin doing the same.  Stephen Root is the other standout here though in a couple of roles that sticks with you besides Rango.</p>
<p>In the end, Rango is an entertaining and bizarre adventure that is hard to not have fun with.  The animation by ILM is impeccable and might be the prettiest animated film to date.  While Verbinski’s film is not quite at that Pixar level, it is an interesting experiment for the medium that can be enjoyed by kid and adult.  But be prepared, the film is out there, and is easily one of the weirdest things to be released from a major studio in recent memory.  I just hope a second viewing washes away the bad taste the Spirit of the West scene left in my mouth and I can fully enjoy the film’s third act.</p>
<p><strong>Rango is a B+</strong></p>
<p><strong><a rel="attachment wp-att-5955" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/06/review-rango/db360-148549-7-tif/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5955" title="Rango2" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rango2-674x281.jpg" alt="" width="674" height="281" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2011/03/06/review-rango/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: The Tourist</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/12/10/review-the-tourist/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/12/10/review-the-tourist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Bettany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rufus Sewell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Berkoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tourist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=5385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tourist takes its two super stars, Depp and Jolie, and uses them effectively to craft a somewhat odd amalgamation of genres that all feel a bit lite, yet still work. Jolie plays Elise, a Brit roaming Paris who is under surveillance constantly by the British governments with the hope that her wanted beau will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F12%2F10%2Freview-the-tourist%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F12%2F10%2Freview-the-tourist%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5387" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/12/10/review-the-tourist/tour_it_1sht_1/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5387" title="TOUR_IT_1SHT_1" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/tourist-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>The Tourist takes its two super stars, Depp and Jolie, and uses them effectively to craft a somewhat odd amalgamation of genres that all feel a bit lite, yet still work.</p>
<p>Jolie plays Elise, a Brit roaming Paris who is under surveillance constantly by the British governments with the hope that her wanted beau will show his pretty new face to see his love.  When she gets a letter at her usual café from her estranged lover to find herself a random stranger on the train to Venice and convince her pursuers that this stranger is the man they are looking for.  That stranger is Frank (Depp), and he is an American math professor on holiday that is more than happy to follow around Elise like a puppy at her beckon call.  Before you know it a third party of mobsters gets involved as they want Elise’s man dead and Frank finds himself in a lot of trouble.</p>
<p>The film has a bit of humor, a bit of action, a bit of romance, a bit of crime, a bit of intrigue, a bit of mystery and it almost adds up to an entire movie.  Unfortunately that movie also only has a bit of a plot and while that is fine the film is built around not very much at all.  <span id="more-5385"></span>Thankfully the filmmakers don’t drag things out and while the film casually moves along its own pace it manages to remain interesting through its eight or nine scenes.  Really, eight or nine, that’s about it; and it’s not a big deal.  It works.  Things aren’t terribly complex or compelling but they are entertaining and pretty look at which only helps the matter.</p>
<p>Sure, Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck’s American debut isn’t anywhere near the brilliance of his debut, The Lives of Others, but this film is a decent start for him in the Hollywood system.  Donnersmarck’s talents do not lend to terribly exciting action set pieces here, both here are snail like and rather dull, but his eye quite beautifully captures the vistas and stars.  The creative team’s choice on tone is another odd conundrum in the film because the drama and comedy works when they throw it out there, but the film seems like it never really knows what kind of movie it wants to be.  Jolie’s Elise is dead serious where as Depp’s Frank is a bit goofy and a much lighter affair when we focus on him.  When they are apart they seem like they are in different films, together they some how blend together into a still entertaining film, you just kind of wish they would have locked into one or the other and ran with it.  One last major thing not helping the film was a score by James Newton Howard that is just all over the place and never fits in with the picture.  This could partially be the lack of a through tone for the picture but to say the least I wasn’t a fan.</p>
<p>The actors in the film do some fine work though no one does anywhere near the best work of their career.  Jolie doesn’t do much different than her mysterious femme fatale role she does so well, though we don’t get to see he kick much ass, and she gives Elise a bit of depth that the script calls for.  Depp on the other hand makes his biggest departure from his weird self in some time but still seems to be having some fun as a goofy American running amuck in Venice.  Paul Bettany is wasted in a straightforward agency role that doesn’t allow him to do much of anything; same goes for Rufus Sewell.  Easily taking the cake as the weakest link of the cast is Steven Berkoff who plays one of the worst and least intimidating villains I have ever seen in a film.  Really hurts the overall impact of the film as he is so non-threatening.  This and the score really hurt the film more than you would think.</p>
<p>In the end, The Tourist is a fun little star studded affair that you can easily enjoy even if it is a bit confounding at times.  It is a back and fourth match with the tone and you can never really settle into what type of film it wants to be.  Fans of Depp and Jolie will have plenty to like as they are in every scene but both have done far better work.  There is a third act spin that is a bit hard to chew but I had a good enough time to not worry about it all that much; and I don’t think they really cheated either anyways.  If interested don’t be afraid of The Tourist and if mildly intrigued I still think you can find some fun in the picture; just be ready for anything.</p>
<p><strong>The Tourist is a B-</strong></p>
<p><strong><a rel="attachment wp-att-5386" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/12/10/review-the-tourist/the-tourist/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5386" title="The Tourist" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/tourist2-674x449.jpg" alt="" width="674" height="449" /></a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/12/10/review-the-tourist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rental Review &#8211; The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/05/26/rental-review-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/05/26/rental-review-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queue Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Garfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Plummer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Ledger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jude Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Cole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Waits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verne Troyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=3697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus is a beautiful looking film with a really intriguing story, but unfortunately doesn&#8217;t answer all of the questions I wish it had.  Looks like I am going to just have to use my imagination to fill in the blanks (See what I did there?  “Imagination”?  That’s right, I went there&#8230;) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F05%2F26%2Frental-review-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F05%2F26%2Frental-review-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3698" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/05/26/rental-review-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/imaginarium_of_doctor_parnassus/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3698" title="imaginarium_of_doctor_parnassus" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/imaginarium_of_doctor_parnassus-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><em>The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus</em> is a beautiful looking film with a really intriguing story, but unfortunately doesn&#8217;t answer all of the questions I wish it had.  Looks like I am going to just have to use my imagination to fill in the blanks (See what I did there?  “Imagination”?  That’s right, I went there&#8230;)</p>
<p>A long time ago in a mountain range far, far away, a supernaturally inclined man named Parnassus was living a life devoted to his faith when a man name Mr. Nick came a’knockin’.  This visit from this devil-esque man set into motion a long lasting relationship for the following hundreds of years based on both men’s inability to say no to competition, gambling, and deal making, eventually leading to a deal in which Parnassus’s entry into the bargain is his own daughter.  When she turns 16 she is to be given over to Mr. Nick, and as this movie just so happens to have it, her 16<sup>th</sup> birthday is right around the corner.  But before Parnassus is forced to make good on his side of the arrangement, Mr. Nick makes one final deal that she will go to whoever is able to collect the most souls before time runs out.<span id="more-3697"></span></p>
<p>The movie takes place in the modern world, but it really has a timeless look to it; especially when moving out of the gloomy streets of the real world and into the world behind the mirror.  Those who find themselves in this magical world of the imagination are shown the magnificent and unexplainable before being given a choice.  Now what this choice actually is is slightly debatable.  The outcome of this decision determines who will win the soul, but seeing as this is not a battle between the devil and God, it is hardly a choice of right and wrong.  Sometimes it seems to be a choice between the life that individual is already leading vs. what will save them from this path (which I have the commentary track to thank for putting one such example into these words), but other times it is less distinct.  But no matter how unclear what is going on happens to be in this world, it sure does look pretty.  The look of the imaginarium is quite similar to the story world in <em>The Fall</em>, if this story was taking place in a Salvador Dalí painting.  On top of the great computer graphics, the practical design elements of the sets and costumes were just as amazing and fitting in this heightened world.</p>
<p>My confusion did not stop with the choices posed to those that enter the world, but with other bits of information given to the audience.  For one thing, it is stated that only one person is supposed to go through the mirror at a time because different minds working at once would make things get out of hand, but more often than not more and more people were in there at once and nothing really seemed to be greatly complicated by this, which seemed like an opportunity lost.  Also, it is never really clear just how much certain individuals really know what is going on in this traveling sideshow that fronts for the imaginarium.  For one thing, it isn’t really clear what exactly his daughter thinks is going on behind the mirror, especially because she has no idea about the wager.  I guess this all hinges on what the imaginarium is normally used for when Parnassus isn’t fighting to keep his daughter.</p>
<p>Though I am left with a lot of questions, the answers aren’t needed to enjoy the film.  Plus, it helps that the acting is great all around.  For starters, it is really nice to see that Verne Troyer is a really talented actor in more serious roles considering most people associate him with Mini-Me.  In addition to Troyer, Lily Cole and Andrew Garfield do great jobs as Parnassus’ daughter and helper respectively though they don’t have a lot of known roles under their belts (PS &#8211; I highly recommend that everyone go rent Garfield’s <em>Boy A</em>).  Both Christopher Plummer as Parnassus and Tom Waits as Mr. Nick give strong performances on their own, but I will say that Waits outshines Plummer in their screen time together as they play off of each other in their interestingly dependent relationship.  Wait’s performance as the devil (if he is actually <em>the</em> devil) is refreshing because it veers from the most evil of all that is evil representation of the main man downstairs, and it is hilarious to watch him try to pick the hopeless Parnassus up so that their game can keep going and going.  Finally, Heath Ledger plays the character of Tony, a man with a questionable past and a truckload of charisma and charm to manipulate those around him even when his motives begin to show the real man below.  And finally, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, and Colin Farrell do not disappoint in their respective mirror world sections in which they build off of Ledger’s “real world” Tony and show the effect that the appeal of this world has on him.</p>
<p>Though I am stuck with a lot of questions about this world, <em>The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus</em> is just as enjoyable without having divulged all the answers about how this world works.  In addition to the intriguing story, the acting and design elements are spectacular, making this a film that should not be missed.</p>
<p><strong>Final Grade:</strong> B+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/05/26/rental-review-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Playing Review &#8211; Alice in Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/15/now-playing-review-alice-in-wonderland/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/15/now-playing-review-alice-in-wonderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Bonham Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Wasikowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=3194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1951 animated version of Alice’s story is far from the top of my list of favorite Disney films from my childhood, but that does not keep me from being overly disappointed in the additional trip down the rabbit hole in this year’s Alice in Wonderland. 13 years following young Alice’s nightmare riddled nights of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fnow-playing-review-alice-in-wonderland%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fnow-playing-review-alice-in-wonderland%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3196" href="http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/15/now-playing-review-alice-in-wonderland/alice_in_wonderland_ver2-2/"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3196" title="alice_in_wonderland_ver2" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/alice_in_wonderland_ver21-187x300.jpg" alt="" width="187" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The 1951 animated version of Alice’s story is far from the top of my list of favorite Disney films from my childhood, but that does not keep me from being overly disappointed in the additional trip down the rabbit hole in this year’s <em>Alice in Wonderland</em>.</p>
<p>13 years following young Alice’s nightmare riddled nights of a mysterious world with crazy talking creatures, Alice finds herself all grown up and in the midst of an engagement party celebrating the proposal that has yet to occur.  When the question is finally popped Alice decides to avoid responding and exercise her affinity for chasing clothed rabbits down really deep holes.  When she eventually makes it into Wonderland a welcoming party of a few familiar faces greets her and we learn that the run in with the rabbit in the real world was a planned occurrence on his part.  Apparently since the last time Alice was there things have taken a turn for the worse and the inhabitants have been searching for the right Alice to fulfill the prophesy of bringing an end to the Red Queen’s reign of terror.  Unfortunately for them Alice is less that enthusiastic about filling those big shoes.<span id="more-3194"></span></p>
<p>The design work used to create Wonderland is definitely the highlight of the film for me, with a lot of beautifully constructed costumes and amazing CGI environments and creatures (including the Cheshire Cat, Jabberwocky, and both the red and white armies) filling out the world.  Unfortunately the story is not one to match the scale of the world.  The majority of the film is actually a revisiting of places Alice came across in the animated film, such as the room with the “drink me” bottle to enter Wonderland and the tea party with the Mad Hatter.  Though this set up plays into a memory sequence later in the film, it just seems like a bunch of uninspired allusions to the prior film as they play out on the screen.  What’s worse is that the time taken going through these familiar scenes overshadows Alice’s mission in this film, which fails to build as the film progresses.  Instead she just spends the majority of the film going through the motions as she prattles on about wanting to wake up from this dream with a chorus of “but you are our champion!” being spouted from the citizens of Wonderland, who are just hoping she will decide to slay the Red Queen’s dragon for them no matter how unenthusiastic she seems about the whole idea.  Once the ending finally does comes around it just seems rushed and tacked on, and continues to get worse as the credits get closer.</p>
<p>The characters of the film go the same way as the story, with acting that could have been much better from the talent collected.  Mia Wasikowska could have been much stronger as Alice instead of just sticking to her “I don’t want to be here” range of expressions and line readings, but I do feel like she has the potential to do much better with a stronger role.  Anne Hathaway is fine as the White Queen, amusingly playing up the upper crustiness in how she carries herself (which you will either find annoying or amusing.  I fell into the latter group, but I love Hathaway).  The actor who does the best in their role is Helena Bonham Carter as the Red Queen, who shines in the moments when she is given more to do than just shout “off with their heads!”  Unfortunately, Johnny Depp’s Mad Hatter is actually a weaker part of the film.  For starters, his character is far too difficult to understand.  He may be insane and should therefore be anything but cut and dry, but usually there is some mind to the madness.  Here it just seems as if Depp was given so much freedom with his interpretation of the character that he never actually finds it.  Furthermore, the spotlight he is given is just not warranted in the end because it pulls focus from Alice, who I am assuming this film is actually supposed to be about.  I mean, her name is in the title and everything…</p>
<p>On the whole I am a big fan of Tim Burton’s films, but unfortunately <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> is not something I can add to the list of his movies that I love.  Overall the design elements may create a really pretty world, but the substance just isn’t there.  And though it may have some of the craziness of the 1951 animated film, it fails to come together in its attempt to become something more than just a trip through madness.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Final Grade:</strong> D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/15/now-playing-review-alice-in-wonderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Alice in Wonderland &#8211; 2010</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/05/review-alice-in-wonderland-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/05/review-alice-in-wonderland-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Rickman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crispin Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Elfman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Bonham Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Wasikowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Fry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=3063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Burton’s latest collaboration with Johnny Depp is a gigantic, uninspired, and boring mess of an adaptation of the Alice in Wonderland mythology. The story is a sequel to Disney’s previous animated version of Alice in Wonderland and picks up some years later with Alice, now nineteen, about to be married off to the son [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F03%2F05%2Freview-alice-in-wonderland-2010%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F03%2F05%2Freview-alice-in-wonderland-2010%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/aliceinwonderland1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3066 alignleft" title="aliceinwonderland1" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/aliceinwonderland1.jpg?w=202" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Tim Burton’s latest collaboration with Johnny Depp is a gigantic, uninspired, and boring mess of an adaptation of the Alice in Wonderland mythology.</p>
<p>The story is a sequel to Disney’s previous animated version of Alice in Wonderland and picks up some years later with Alice, now nineteen, about to be married off to the son of an old family friend that is very well to do but Alice is still haunted? By reoccurring “dreams” of her trip to Wonderland as a child.  When the young man proposes to her in front of a giant crowd at a prearranged engagement party, Alice gets cold feat and runs off into the garden, chasing the white rabbit, and down into a rabbit hole and back into the world of Wonderland.  The look of the place has changed significantly and we discover from a few familiar faces that there is a long standing search for Alice and they aren’t quite sure if this Alice is the real one.  The prophecy is that Alice will return to Wonderland to rid it of the tyrant Red Queen and restore peace to the once jovial nation.</p>
<p><span id="more-3063"></span>Now, I have a lot of problems with this film, but first and foremost I just didn’t find it at all that engaging or entertaining.  When the film isn’t seemingly just walking down memory lane of Wonderland, and it does a lot of this for the first hour, the story they try to concoct is so unoriginal and uninspired it just never grabs you.  The plot also has countless gapping holes in it, just ignores logic, and makes no sense on a number of occasions.  From the desperate attempt to give the Mad Hater some depth to his character, the complete surface depth of the evil characters, the use of CGI for Crispin Glover’s body, and the fact that nobody in Wonderland seems to like the Red Queen yet she is some how in power, these are just the tipping point of problems I have without spoiling things.</p>
<p>Possibly my biggest issue with the film is Alice’s demeanor and logic on her being in Wonderland.  She is convinced this experience is a dream, even though her old method of waking up from one doesn’t work.  Also, she doesn’t seem to remember or recognize Wonderland, how is this possible?  It doesn’t look all that different and she has previously told us that she is still having “dreams” about her first trip to Wonderland so why is everything so foreign to her?  It takes 95% of the movie to unfold before she starts to finally come to this realization and I don’t know if she ever acknowledges that she really had been here before, but more or less just bought into the laid out prophecy.</p>
<p>Burton given this endless world of imagination brings next to nothing new to table and the film is creatively dry if you ask me.  The moments that work in the film are re-hashes of the animated film, Cheshire Cat and the Blue Caterpillar are a pair of the very few highlights, and I just didn’t find the world incredibly rich or wondrous.  Also of note, the use of 3-D is just as uninspired and pointless and not necessary for the viewing enjoyment of the picture.  Avatar has spoiled us and I think a lot of the 3-D pictures this year will come across as a disappointment in that element as most directors are still trying to figure out how to use the medium.  The CGI in the picture, especially for one that cost two hundred million dollars, was also not that impressive stylistically or consistently.  There are a number of shots in the picture that do look gangbusters, don’t get me wrong, but for every winner there are two shots that look a little too eh.  Danny Elfman&#8217;s score is even an uninspired and unnoticeable element to the film.</p>
<p>The acting work in the film is also nothing to write home about and none of the on screen actors do anything special for the entirety of the picture.  Helena Bonham Carter is the highlight as the Red Queen but her part gets stale and repetitive in a hurry.  Johnny Depp’s interpretation of the Mad Hatter is bad weird and never really worked for me as he tried to give him a dark side, or something, on the inside.  The kookiness of the character never charms or is all that funny and it is probably one of the worst turns of the gifted actor’s careers.  Mia Wasikowska stars as Alice and she is unfortunately really flat and has no pep what so ever in the picture.  She dully delivers her lines and doesn’t have the cheery aloofness Alice has in the animated classic, Wasikowska does come a bit alive in the third act.  Anne Hathaway needs to put her hands down, Crispin Glover does alright and kind of weird work, but most of the voice actors do solid jobs in their roles.  Stephen Fry as the Cheshire Cat and Alan Rickman as Blue Caterpillar are the highlights of the voice actors, and the voice casting was one of the few things Burton got right.</p>
<p>In the end, Alice in Wonderland is nothing but a big mess.  Where the original film was a crazy and tripped out adventure through this mysterious and wondrous world, Burton and company try and give this iteration a plot that is stale, uninspired, and unoriginal that leaves us scratching our heads.  Beyond being unoriginal the film doesn’t really flow very well, idling with nothing much happening for the majority of the picture, and then tries to patch together a plot that makes no sense with gaping plot holes to get us to the finale.  The acting is weak, the direction uninspired, effects that are dull, and 3D that is pointless and misused there is nothing to really recommend about this picture.  A front runner for biggest flop of the year due to the talent involved, there are at least a couple characters and scenes worth checking out but this is a rental at best and the worst Burton and Depp film to date by a wide margin.</p>
<p><strong>Alice and Wonderland is a F</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/aliceinwonderland.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3065" title="aliceinwonderland" src="http://havingsaidthat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/aliceinwonderland.jpg" alt="" width="655" height="434" /></a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/03/05/review-alice-in-wonderland-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus</title>
		<link>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/01/16/the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/</link>
		<comments>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/01/16/the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Garfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Plummer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Ledger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jude Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Cole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Gilliam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Waits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verne Troyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havingsaidthat.net/?p=2681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry Gilliam’s latest is a bizarre and imaginative tale that while a bit scatter shot and unclear at times it is still rather entertaining and allows for a great ensemble to have a lot of fun. Dr. Parnassus is an old man, centuries old in fact, and he is involved in an elaborate betting game [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F01%2F16%2Fthe-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhavingsaidthat.net%2F2010%2F01%2F16%2Fthe-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://havingsaidthat.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/imaginariumofdoctorparnassus.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2682" title="imaginariumofdoctorparnassus" src="http://havingsaidthat.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/imaginariumofdoctorparnassus.jpg?w=225" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a>Terry Gilliam’s latest is a bizarre and imaginative tale that while a bit scatter shot and unclear at times it is still rather entertaining and allows for a great ensemble to have a lot of fun.<br />
Dr. Parnassus is an old man, centuries old in fact, and he is involved in an elaborate betting game with the Devil that has gone back and forth over hundreds of years.  Eternal life, women, and countless other stakes have been in play between the two and the fate of Parnassus’ daughter Valentina is currently up for grabs.  The game they play revolves around a mirror in the possession of Parnassus who travels around in a mobile stage with a troupe including his daughter, himself, Anton who is a slight of hand artist, and Percy who is a little person that has been with Parnassus for ages, as they perform a show enticing patrons to pass through the mirror which takes them into their own imagination which are than manipulated by both The Devil and Parnassus toward a choice that must be made in their favor to win the game.  With only days remaining till Valentina’s sixteenth birthday, the day in which she will become the property of the devil, a game to the first to gain patrons five souls begins and a mysterious young man comes into the troupe’s life when they find him hanging under a bridge, seemingly to his death.<span id="more-2681"></span><br />
I apologize for so much exposition on the plot but I believe this film can be further enjoyed by those that enter with the right frame of mind of what they are getting into.  Also, that paragraph more clearly explains what is going on than the actual picture as the plot is revealed randomly as we go along and not in any sort of order.  And I’m not saying that isn’t fine, in fact that is part of the films charm and lends itself to the weirdness of it all, I just think the more prepared you are to handle that weirdness the more accessible the film will be to the average moviegoer.  Beyond the weird structure of the film, the flashbacks, the mirror world, and just about every character has some sort of bizarre quirk to it and if you don’t dig the weird you best steer else where as this is probably not up your ally.<br />
All cautions aside, the imagination on display here is quite spectacular, beautiful even, and I was happy to get lost in Gilliam’s world.  Everyone mirror world is a bit different and it is a shame we didn’t get to see more of it with the middle chunk of the film keeping us all but out of the mirror.  Gilliam instead wisely uses this time to oddly set up the film through its all over structure and while its enjoyable it is quite the work out for the viewer.  Gilliam’s vision is strong though and the effects in the mirror world are fantastically surreal and a blast to play in.  The production design on the troupe’s caravan is also quite the accomplishment as well and is one of the coolest parts of the feature.<br />
The actors in play are also quite good from top to bottom starting with Christopher Plummer as the delightfully kooky Dr. Parnassus.  Weird, drunk, and brilliant mash together quite well and Plummer does a great job of keeping the character relatable even though he is almost of another world.  The Devil is devilishly (sorry) played with delight by Tom Waits who is great as always.  You can tell why Parnassus keeps getting sucked into wagers with the man, he is so damn convincing, and as usual we leave the picture wishing we could have had more from Mister Waits.  Heath Ledger plays the real world version of the hanged man they find, Tony, who is short on memory and full of ideas.  Ledger is effectively eccentric and a bit slimy as the mysterious man that the Devil puts into play and does a very fine job at slowly becoming a bit of a shady individual as the film roles on.  His charisma is unstoppable though and as he sweeps women off their feet to try and participate in the show we easily understand why.  Lily Cole is sexy and solid as Valentina and does a fine job at creating warmth with Plummer and gives us somewhat normal to care about in the picture.  Verne Troyer is quite funny as Percy as well and is at his best when he and Plummer are bouncing off one another like a pair that has been bickering for thousands of years.  Andrew Garfield is my least favorite in the cast and I just had a tough time believing his feelings towards Valentina and resentment towards Tony.  Though he does a fine enough job to satisfy his need to the story, just wish he came off a tad less annoying.  Johnny Depp, Jude Law, and Colin Farrell all play a different incarnation of Tony on his three separate trips into the mirror and all of them do a fantastic job of capturing the spirit of Ledger’s Tony while adding in the fantastical feeling Tony has when exposed to the mirror world.  Farrell gets the most work and is the best of the three I might add, though they all do quite a fine job if you ask me giving each version of Tony a unique feel.<br />
In the end, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus is a beautiful and creative world that is as weird as it is unique.  Gilliam’s vision is strong and clear, even if his structure is not, and he gets some great work out of almost all of his actors.  Diving into the imagination has never been so much fun and neither has games with the devil.  As original and imaginative of a world to be found in cinemas in sometime, Dr. Parnassus’ Imaginarium is a place any fan of the weird should surely visit.<br />
<strong>The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus is a B</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://havingsaidthat.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/imaginariumofdoctorparnassus2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2683" title="imaginariumofdoctorparnassus2" src="http://havingsaidthat.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/imaginariumofdoctorparnassus2.jpg" alt="" width="655" height="434" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://havingsaidthat.net/2010/01/16/the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

